Tag: public option


Juneau Smog
 

Subtracting the Political Calculus

by Memeticdrool
Wednesday, January 20, 2010 at 11:45pm Juneau Smog Blog Post Permalink Blog Post Trackback Read/Leave Comments Juneau Smog Twitter Retweet Subtracting the Political Calculus

As all four political estates digest the MA election, some attention is naturally settling on what effect this will have on the Senate’s ability to move forward. In brief: Democrats never had it so good.

While the political pendulum swings, and no party should delude themselves with “permanent majority” talk, Dem’s have all the time they need. They’ve tried the high road of parliamentary politics, and Congressional Republicans have clearly demonstrated they will sacrifice American lives for their own petty power agenda. It’s not the first time conservatives have demonstrated their party-first politics (“nuclear option” anyone?), but it is time to let go of fantasies that the current conservative members of Congress will suddenly start voting for reasonable policy on its merits. It is simply not going to happen.

From the Whitehouse to the Senate and House, extending the legislative olive branch to R’s was gracious, honorable, and much more than they deserved post Bush 43. Now that the Republican hand is on the table, it’s time to get stuff done with or without them. Americans are dying or losing their homes or enduring any number of ills inherited from the last 30 years of bad policy and bad thinking. Regardless of who is to blame, we need to get the policy foundations laid so hard working Americans can proceed with fixing the problems. There are ways to get things done in Congress. Everyone knows this, and no one need apologize for doing the right thing and moving forward. Dems need to get it done via any and every available means necessary to save American lives from those who will otherwise hold Americans hostage to advance their own failed political quackery.

In 2009, Democrats made one big mistake: they let 60 seats – political calculus – take center stage. Now that no one need be misled by a magic number, roll up the sleeves and bring it, Dems.

  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Blogplay
  • Current
  • Faves
  • laaik.it
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz

| | | | View Comments


Juneau Smog
 

Joe Wilson’s public option amendment

by Calickizzle
Friday, November 13, 2009 at 12:03pm Juneau Smog Blog Post Permalink Blog Post Trackback Read/Leave Comments Juneau Smog Twitter Retweet Joe Wilson’s public option amendment

Last week, to little fanfare, Joe “You Lie!” Wilson unveiled an amendment that would “force” members of Congress onto the “government-run public option” that was about to be passed in the House’s approval of HR 3962 (supposedly he got the idea while having lunch with a group of seniors in Hilton Head, SC):

“If [U.S. House] Speaker [Nancy] Pelosi insists on shoving this bill through, then I believe that Members of Congress should go onto the government-run option,” Wilson said. “If it is good enough for the American people, then it is certainly good enough for Congress.”

Of course, Wilson didn’t bother to point out that if he partakes in the standard Congressional health plan as provided by Federal Employees Health benefit Plan (FEHBP), which covers all 8 million federal employees, the federal government- as in, our tax dollars- covers 75% of his monthly premium.  Not a bad public option that Rep. Wilson currently enjoys, and which he is posturing to prevent others who currently have no option from enjoying.  What a guy!

(more…)

  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Blogplay
  • Current
  • Faves
  • laaik.it
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz

| | | | | View Comments


Juneau Smog
 

Jsmog Snap Poll 10/27/09

by Jsmog
Tuesday, October 27, 2009 at 01:23pm Juneau Smog Blog Post Permalink Blog Post Trackback Read/Leave Comments Juneau Smog Twitter Retweet Jsmog Snap Poll 10/27/09

Our last poll “How often should Jsmog.com display new polls” posted almost a month ago received “seven” responses, 4 of which said there should be daily polls. Although daily polls would be great, with only seven responses in a month, we will have to get a lot more responses before we can start putting up daily polls.

Our latest poll has to do with what you think the US Senate should do if a final Health Care Reform bill is brought to the senate floor without a Public Option. Support for a government-run health care option is gaining ground in the Senate and could be included in the final bill. However, a version of the public option that is looking like it will make the final bill has a provision that allows states to “opt out” of such a program if their governor or legislature chose to do so. This Public Option “Option” may satisfy both liberal and moderate Democrats while not driving away others, in order to reach the 60 votes it needs to advance the legislation without a filibuster. Our poll asks what the Senate should do if a public option is not included in the final bill at all.

  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Blogplay
  • Current
  • Faves
  • laaik.it
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Polls | | | View Comments


Juneau Smog
 

Where Do Our Premiums Go?

by Jsmog
Tuesday, October 6, 2009 at 04:12pm Juneau Smog Blog Post Permalink Blog Post Trackback Read/Leave Comments Juneau Smog Twitter Retweet Where Do Our Premiums Go?

When insurance companies are paying over half their profits for lobbyist and legal fees, that’s obviously money not going to provide benefits to policy holders with their health care bills. Because of their lack or regulation they legally have the right to hike up their rates whenever they want. Because of this their membership rates are down but they are still able to make huge profits off less customers. In three years the profits of Wellpoint, the nation’s largest health insurance company, went up 90% while their memberships rates were down 3%. Netting $2.5 billion in profits last year wasn’t enough for WellPoint. Now, WellPoint’s affiliate, Anthem Blue Cross and Blue Shield, is suing the state of Maine for refusing to guarantee it a profit margin in the midst of a painful recession:

(more…)

  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Blogplay
  • Current
  • Faves
  • laaik.it
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Media | | | | | | | | View Comments


Juneau Smog
 

Socialism That Helps People: Bad. Socialism That Helps Property: Good

by Jsmog
Tuesday, October 6, 2009 at 03:55am Juneau Smog Blog Post Permalink Blog Post Trackback Read/Leave Comments Juneau Smog Twitter Retweet Socialism That Helps People: Bad. Socialism That Helps Property: Good

[Transcript (edited):]

The Republicans who oppose health care reform and the conservative Democrats who oppose a public option have deeply principled, philosophical objections to the concept of government insurance—except when insurance companies benefit from it.

The big arguments against the public option have been these: that the government is incapable of running an insurance plan, that the free-market provides consumers with better choices, that socialized insurance will have unfair advantages. But as Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist David Cay Johnston recently reported, these arguments do not stop some of the big opponents of socialized insurance for voting for socialized insurance when that insurance is not for the well being of people, but for the well being of property.

(more…)

  • RSS
  • email
  • Print
  • PDF
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • FriendFeed
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Blogplay
  • Current
  • Faves
  • laaik.it
  • LinkArena
  • LinkedIn
  • Live
  • Mixx
  • MySpace
  • NewsVine
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Tumblr
  • Yahoo! Buzz

Media | | | | | | View Comments